<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Otev\u0159en\u00e1 diskuse je funk\u010dn\u00edm n\u00e1strojem odborn\u00e9ho diskurzu, ale je i form\u00e1tem, kter\u00fd m\u00e1 sv\u00e9 meze.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Diskuse v auditoriu se vyv\u00edjela od po\u010d\u00e1tku tak, jako by um\u011bleck\u00e1 kritika m\u011bla ze sv\u00e9 povahy jen negativn\u00ed dopad a jakoby jej\u00edm c\u00edlem nebylo hodnocen\u00ed, ale odsouzen\u00ed. Tak tomu ale nen\u00ed, odborn\u00e1 kritika m\u00e1 stejn\u011b tak poukazovat na \u201echyby\u201c jako zprost\u0159edkovat progresivn\u00ed tv\u016fr\u010d\u00ed gesta. Jinak \u0159e\u010deno, verb\u00e1ln\u011b zp\u0159\u00edstupnit v\u00fdznamy prezentovan\u00e9 obrazov\u00fdm jazykem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Um\u011bleck\u00e9 d\u00edlo je v\u00fdkonem tv\u016fr\u010d\u00edho individua a nen\u00ed p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvkem do n\u011bjak\u00e9ho p\u0159edem vyhran\u011bn\u00e9ho vzorce. Pr\u00e1v\u011b tak ani kritik nem\u00e1 k dispozici n\u011bjak\u00fd vzorn\u00edk tv\u016fr\u010d\u00edch gest, kter\u00fdm by pom\u011b\u0159oval nov\u00e1 d\u00edla. Tato nejist\u00e1 p\u016fda estetick\u00e9 zku\u0161enosti a tv\u016fr\u010d\u00ed dynamiky ale neotv\u00edr\u00e1 dve\u0159e osobn\u00ed zv\u016fli. Um\u011blec i kritik se pohybuj\u00ed na poli historicky podm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9 dynamiky um\u011bleck\u00e9 zku\u0161enosti a oba tu maj\u00ed sv\u00e9 vymezen\u00e9 m\u00edsto. Um\u011blec nal\u00e9z\u00e1 v\u00fdrazov\u00e9 n\u00e1stroje, jak pojmenovat dosud nepojmenovan\u00e9 a kritik m\u00e1 mo\u017enost (mo\u017en\u00e1, \u017ee i povinnost) jak napomoci zobecn\u011bn\u00ed tv\u016fr\u010d\u00edch gest, tak p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b pouk\u00e1zat na \u201echyby\u201c, kter\u00fdmi se um\u011blec proh\u0159e\u0161il proti tvo\u0159ivosti, jsou-li tu takov\u00e9. Takovou \u201echybou\u201c m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt napodobov\u00e1n\u00ed a p\u0159eb\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed ji\u017e pou\u017eit\u00fdch gest, z\u00fa\u017een\u00ed zku\u0161enostn\u00edho horizontu, co\u017e m\u016f\u017ee v\u00e9st vynal\u00e9z\u00e1n\u00ed ji\u017e vynalezen\u00e9ho atd.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kritik ov\u0161em postupuje s v\u011bdom\u00edm, \u017ee on s\u00e1m nem\u00e1 patent na estetick\u00fd soud, n\u00fdbr\u017e je sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed \u0161irok\u00e9ho proudu soci\u00e1ln\u00ed zku\u0161enosti, a tud\u00ed\u017e sv\u00e9 kritick\u00e9 argumenty nem\u016f\u017ee kl\u00e1st sv\u00e9voln\u011b a nezd\u016fvodn\u011bn\u011b. Jinak \u0159e\u010deno, proto\u017ee se um\u011blec i kritik pohybuj\u00ed na nestabiln\u00edm poli tv\u016fr\u010d\u00ed zku\u0161enosti, kritik nem\u00e1 v\u016f\u010di kritizovan\u00e9mu nad\u0159azenou pozici. Nen\u00ed v pozici \u0159ezn\u00edka, jak vyj\u00e1d\u0159il v diskusi Ond\u0159ej Chrob\u00e1k. U\u017e z tohoto d\u016fvodu, mysl\u00edm, dobr\u00e1 kritika nem\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt zra\u0148uj\u00edc\u00ed, proto\u017ee kritik sv\u00fdmi soudy nese svou k\u016f\u017ei na trh (p\u0159esn\u011bji svou osobn\u00ed zku\u0161enost) a m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt v\u017edy obvin\u011bn, \u017ee d\u00edlu neporozum\u011bl.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
V diskusi byla zm\u00edn\u011bna mo\u017enost paraleln\u00edch kritik stejn\u00e9ho d\u00edla. T\u00fdk\u00e1 se toho m\u00e1 zku\u0161enost s publikov\u00e1n\u00edm samizdatu N\u011bkdo n\u011bco<\/em> v 80. letech. Paraleln\u00ed recenze jedin\u00e9 v\u00fdstavy od r\u016fzn\u00fdch autor\u016f odkr\u00fdvaly re\u00e1lnou otev\u0159enost a neukotvenost odborn\u00e9ho diskurzu, co\u017e m\u011blo u \u010dten\u00e1\u0159\u016f \u017eiv\u00fd ohlas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sou\u010dasn\u00fd stav um\u011bleck\u00e9 kritiky str\u00e1d\u00e1 mimo jin\u00e9 nedostatkem spolupr\u00e1ce. Je to p\u0159ekvapiv\u00e9, proto\u017ee jak s\u00e1m pojem \u201espolupr\u00e1ce\u201c tak i sama soci\u00e1ln\u00ed dimenze \u201ej\u00e1\u201c, jsou dnes b\u011b\u017en\u00fdm t\u00e9matem odborn\u00e9ho diskurzu. Je tedy s podivem, \u017ee nap\u0159. prostor pro koment\u00e1\u0159e v p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvc\u00edch na Artalku z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1 zpravidla nevyu\u017eit. P\u0159i tom by pr\u00e1v\u011b takov\u00e9 kroky zobec\u0148uj\u00edc\u00ed osobn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edstupy pomohly zefektivnit um\u011bleckou kritiku a soci\u00e1ln\u00ed relevanci um\u011bleck\u00e9ho diskurzu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Ludv\u00edk Hlav\u00e1\u010dek je historik um\u011bn\u00ed a teoretik sou\u010dasn\u00e9ho um\u011bn\u00ed. V\u00a0sou\u010dasnosti je \u0159editelem Nadace sou\u010dasn\u00e9ho um\u011bn\u00ed. Pozn\u00e1mka se zab\u00fdv\u00e1 diskus\u00ed <\/em>Druh\u00e1 dek\u00e1da na sc\u00e9n\u011b: Je kritika v\u00a0roce 2023 je\u0161t\u011b mo\u017en\u00e1? Pot\u0159ebujeme ji?\u00a0A k\u00a0\u010demu?, kter\u00e1 prob\u011bhla v\u00a0NCSU 18. 1. 2023, z\u00e1znam je dostupn\u00fd zde<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Otev\u0159en\u00e1 diskuse je funk\u010dn\u00edm n\u00e1strojem odborn\u00e9ho diskurzu, ale je i form\u00e1tem, kter\u00fd m\u00e1 sv\u00e9 meze. Diskuse v auditoriu se vyv\u00edjela od po\u010d\u00e1tku tak, jako by um\u011bleck\u00e1 kritika m\u011bla ze sv\u00e9 povahy jen negativn\u00ed dopad a jakoby jej\u00edm c\u00edlem nebylo hodnocen\u00ed, ale odsouzen\u00ed. Tak tomu ale nen\u00ed, odborn\u00e1 kritika m\u00e1 stejn\u011b tak poukazovat na \u201echyby\u201c jako zprost\u0159edkovat progresivn\u00ed tv\u016fr\u010d\u00ed gesta. Jinak \u0159e\u010deno, verb\u00e1ln\u011b zp\u0159\u00edstupnit v\u00fdznamy prezentovan\u00e9 obrazov\u00fdm jazykem. Um\u011bleck\u00e9 d\u00edlo je v\u00fdkonem tv\u016fr\u010d\u00edho individua a nen\u00ed p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvkem do n\u011bjak\u00e9ho p\u0159edem vyhran\u011bn\u00e9ho vzorce. Pr\u00e1v\u011b tak ani kritik nem\u00e1 k dispozici n\u011bjak\u00fd vzorn\u00edk tv\u016fr\u010d\u00edch gest, kter\u00fdm by pom\u011b\u0159oval nov\u00e1 d\u00edla. Tato nejist\u00e1 p\u016fda estetick\u00e9 zku\u0161enosti \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":381,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-607","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cenavj.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cenavj.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cenavj.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cenavj.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cenavj.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=607"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.cenavj.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/607\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":639,"href":"https:\/\/www.cenavj.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/607\/revisions\/639"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cenavj.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cenavj.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cenavj.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cenavj.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}